Why Not Sarah?

… calls it how she sees it, exposing manipulation, hypocrisy, abuse, and grift with the insight of someone who has seen it all. While morally kind, and respectful to those offering respect, she isn’t always nice, and she doesn’t hestitate to expose the truths of corrupt systems, including a weaponized government that isn’t coming to save us and should never make it more difficult for us to save ourselves and each other.

She cares about people and principles, not party politics. If you prefer hero-worship, cancel culture, tribalism, blind loyalty, comfortable silence, or selective outrage to the socractic method of truth seeking, she’s the wrong choice for you.

She rejects binary choices and bipartisanship for bipartisanship’s sake, and she’ll tell you the truth about complexity, even when it’s condensed to a meme. Prepare for nuance, trade-offs, and hard realities about the problems facing New Hampshire and the nation. Negotiating compromises solely between two bad choices overwhelmingly gives us worse outcomes. It’s time for new solutions.

In that vein, she has no love for the two party system. While a classical liberal running as a Democrat, Sarah is independent. Without lower barriers to ballot access, third-parties and independent candidates with fresh ideas are forced to choose between expensive and risky signature collection, and declaring candidacy with a major party.

She offers absolute adherence to the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP). However, this does not prevent her from ferociously defending principles like free speech, economic opportunity, gun rights and safety, privacy, due process, border security with a focus on improving pathways to legal immigration, individual civil liberties, and evidence-based and constitutional policy.

She is VEHEMENTLY anti-scapegoating. If you believe that your problems are caused by immigrants (or any other minority), you’re wrong. The overwhelming majority of immigrants pay taxes and receive no services. Witch hunts are so Massachusetts.

She applies psychology to politics because that’s exactly what is being done to us, and politicians are ill-equipped to respond. She has earned a practical understanding of power, systems that serve it, incentives that move it, and a grounded acceptance of the best and worst that it can do.

She’s witty while being dead serious. Sharp, often dark humor paired with zero sacred cows. Laughter might lead to actual thinking. Threat to performative politics on all sides. Expect higher standards and fewer echo chambers.

Final warning: supporting Sarah may cause increased personal responsibility, clearer strategic thinking, occasional discomfort with reality, and additional cravings for intellectual honesty. Side effects include rejecting clout-chasers, starting mutual-aid societies, and demanding better from yourself and others. Not suitable for those who prefer a government nanny, a corporate ruler, or comfortable tribal narratives.